A radical. Someone on the fringe. The outcast, with a repressed desire to do something more than they are.
The ideas of radicals cause for sudden change, which is why violence is often the halmark of a radical's actions. The sudden change creates violence because violence is still the abnormality of society. It is thrown at us, but the experience is denied and that is why radicals advocate violence. A solution, if one were to jump to conclusions, would be to allow them to experience violence. NO.
The root cause is their desire to do something they are not. The achievement to a higher level of society is often what they seek, and since they can't go higher, and they can only stay where they are, they want to destroy the hierarchy.
I know this comes out of nowhere and you probably did not expect social-radical philosophy to be on this blog. Neither did I. Violence, however, is never the answer. It is the society that rises from the ashes and keeps rising until the next burning that is remembered in history for its treatment of humanity and the greatness it achieved. The violence, however, is always the downfall. Violence is always the end of society. The between points in history where civlization is growing, prospering, is repetitive. Societies rise with laws and order and leadership, and always seems to follow a process. The violent upheavals that tear down a society are always different with a different story to it. The purpose of the violence changes every time: one repressed group seeking freedom, another seeking more of something, and sometimes the lacking saw those with something lower their gaurd. However the process of the downfall is different and involves thought in itself. However it is not a man who destroys society: it is an animal.
The instict to take, instead of earn, comes from animals. The concept of earning, of living is in us alone. Mankind has achieved the step above animal however can be dragged back when our minds lose their places in society. When our minds are pressured, through suffering from desire or from pain, the animal is revived and the humanity dies. The purpose of society should be the reduction of suffering to a level that allows for the continued growth of society.
I've been reading the writings of radicals lately. No, I have not adopted the viewpoints of their writings. I've analyzed their meanings, their sources. I want to know how to stop them from destroying society. Some claim to want another society when they are finished, others claim an act of solitary violence will alter society to what it should be. I know they are wrong. The radicals have their underground because the animals will never overcome us. They must join the animals in our sewers, in our forests, outside our homes of comfort and our workplaces of living. They are cast out for their primal desires and must stay out for they lost their humanity. The key to what I am saying is that we should stop them from needing to go into the underground.
The purpose of society, according to the radicals before the violent steps are chosen, are to help the neediest of us all: the people with nothing but desire for that which they have not earned.
Their viewpoint is disguised as compassion at first. They join the humanity side which helps those who cannot help themselves. However soon it is realized that they can not disguise it any further, the animal within them doesn't get enough. When there is hope of getting something they want, the animal sleeps, but it doesn't go away. Right now Barack Obama, either out of genuine compassion, or as I fear, out of animal instict, is the hope for the radicals. They are staying at bay for the most part because they put their faith in democracy to give them what they wanted: that which they desired. (Wealth.)
For humans being an animal is a 50/50 road. Cannibalism isn't chosen, but the desire for society's wealth is. The creations of society are desired by the radicals as a dog desires scraps from the dinner made by its master. If not given enough, the dog will attack. Sometimes it is trained, and controlled, so that when it does not get what it wants it attacks, but what the master tells it to. The desire is thrown into emotion and rage against a target. The despirate believe anything.
I am writing this as a manifesto. Not as a radical, but a defender of society. The radicals are repressed, yes, but they resort to violence. They seek the violence. I do not. I oppose them. I may sound ambiguous, but I am speaking in exact detail. The nouns can be replaced over and over again but the meaning will be the same. Apply it to your daily life and the meaning remains the same every time. These are not the ravings of a madman. Thank you for reading.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
I AM NOT AFRAID
"The Coming Insurrection" is a book. I have thus far read three paragraphs. The danger of the book is in its logic followed by insanity. The statement of grievances against the current system create a mental opening to options, and then they provide a historical example to replicate. Be on gaurd in your lives for this tactic. I urge you to take social complaints with a blocked mind. It is the same approach by Barack Obama.
He will mention the pain of those suffering with the current healthcare system. Then say that all those opposed to his method are the ones who also want to have that pain continue. This then leaves his option as the only option because otherwise it is the same suffering being endured. The hatred stirred by the social grievance of healthcare issues is directed to anyone who is against the public option in Obama's plan. Obama says that those against his reform are against all and any reform which is completely untrue. The book takes the same approach, and so does the world's dictators. The comparison is not spiteful or sinnical. It is true.
Chavez, when the people oppose his reforms to the Constitution, blames the U.S. for plotting against the people's happiness. In the mind of Zelaya, former president of Honduras, his removal was a coup by the U.S. and not by the people of Honduras. The other nation's can blame the United States because we are the "super power". We in the U.S. can not blame another country for our grievances because of our power and wealth. Obama then has to direct the blame to within, to his oppoents in the U.S. The Republican Party is this verbal punching bag he has set up, sometimes Fox News, sometimes the rich, or generally the right. It changes to what he needs it to be.
You want proof, the GM bankruptcy, when it occured, Obama blamed share holders and banks for not giving GM the money and expecting the terrible act of federal funding to intervene. This was despite the situation of GM at that point was due to federal funding intervention in the first place (and in case you missed it the bankruptcy happened anyway.) Then, when it came time for healthcare Obama stated that if we don't fix our healthcare we will go the way of GM with excessive healthcare costs. The enemy changed overnight. It was no longer the banks with rich CEOs, it was the healthcare industry charging GM too much for insurance for the workers. The emotion of the GM bankruptcy was the mind opener to rage, and then the rage was directed to the insurance companies.
This tactic must be fought against with logic. We must remember every statement, hold the statements in audio, video, and in written form. The grievances must be examined and the switch overs in this tactic must be outlined and brought to the public's attention. The hatred should be focused on what you know to be true in your own experiences. The stories told of people that bring out your emotion and make you attached, whose suffering then brings out emotion, should be ignored. You need to close yourself to the reception of emotional explanations for government action.
If you see the homeless in your city, help them. If a politician tells you about the homeless to get something they want done, tell the politician to be quiet. Tell the people on the street corners giving speeches to crowds that unless they can bring the person needing help to the crowd, they should not ask for help at all. Jerry's Kids does this brilliantly. You know your helping them because you know the people are there to help and that once you give the money, the people who need help are there to recieve it. However when Obama says we need to support this healthcare to help people, and never brings those people to us, he is lying to us. With them not there to recieve his help, or us to know that they are going to get this help proposed by Obama, we must silence the lies and bring forth the truth.
He will mention the pain of those suffering with the current healthcare system. Then say that all those opposed to his method are the ones who also want to have that pain continue. This then leaves his option as the only option because otherwise it is the same suffering being endured. The hatred stirred by the social grievance of healthcare issues is directed to anyone who is against the public option in Obama's plan. Obama says that those against his reform are against all and any reform which is completely untrue. The book takes the same approach, and so does the world's dictators. The comparison is not spiteful or sinnical. It is true.
Chavez, when the people oppose his reforms to the Constitution, blames the U.S. for plotting against the people's happiness. In the mind of Zelaya, former president of Honduras, his removal was a coup by the U.S. and not by the people of Honduras. The other nation's can blame the United States because we are the "super power". We in the U.S. can not blame another country for our grievances because of our power and wealth. Obama then has to direct the blame to within, to his oppoents in the U.S. The Republican Party is this verbal punching bag he has set up, sometimes Fox News, sometimes the rich, or generally the right. It changes to what he needs it to be.
You want proof, the GM bankruptcy, when it occured, Obama blamed share holders and banks for not giving GM the money and expecting the terrible act of federal funding to intervene. This was despite the situation of GM at that point was due to federal funding intervention in the first place (and in case you missed it the bankruptcy happened anyway.) Then, when it came time for healthcare Obama stated that if we don't fix our healthcare we will go the way of GM with excessive healthcare costs. The enemy changed overnight. It was no longer the banks with rich CEOs, it was the healthcare industry charging GM too much for insurance for the workers. The emotion of the GM bankruptcy was the mind opener to rage, and then the rage was directed to the insurance companies.
This tactic must be fought against with logic. We must remember every statement, hold the statements in audio, video, and in written form. The grievances must be examined and the switch overs in this tactic must be outlined and brought to the public's attention. The hatred should be focused on what you know to be true in your own experiences. The stories told of people that bring out your emotion and make you attached, whose suffering then brings out emotion, should be ignored. You need to close yourself to the reception of emotional explanations for government action.
If you see the homeless in your city, help them. If a politician tells you about the homeless to get something they want done, tell the politician to be quiet. Tell the people on the street corners giving speeches to crowds that unless they can bring the person needing help to the crowd, they should not ask for help at all. Jerry's Kids does this brilliantly. You know your helping them because you know the people are there to help and that once you give the money, the people who need help are there to recieve it. However when Obama says we need to support this healthcare to help people, and never brings those people to us, he is lying to us. With them not there to recieve his help, or us to know that they are going to get this help proposed by Obama, we must silence the lies and bring forth the truth.
Examining More Claims
The email sent out by the mainedems.org's Arden Manning said the following:
Republicans just don't get it! Barack Obama was not elected president because he has a cool logo. Barack Obama was elected president because the vast majority of Americans are more in line with his political views and values and because they agreed it is time for a change.
Excerpt over. Lets look at Obama's political views and values. They always say actions speak louder than words, and indeed they do with Obama. His words, the words of a politician, can instantly be seen as almost worthless (except to those who believe he still isn't a politician.)
Now what I am about to say will probably seem like old news and unimportant. However it is of the utmost importance. The life of leaders and why they make the decisions they do start in their developing careers. For some, and don't take offense, it is only a reference I know because of the History Channel's numerous documentaries, the process starts in youth before politics are even considered. Hitler's hatred of the Jews developed when Germany lost WW1 and Jews were the outlet for his anger of suffering the trauma of war on the front lines. Barack Obama's political career has effected his decisions and should be looked to in order to see where we are going. I feel that Hitler's Mein Kamf was the plan of his WW2 madness. Barack Obama has a Mein Kamf as well and it is his actions already made. He was smart, because written words now are looked at unlike they were during the days of Hitler. So his actions are his greatest liability and they are known. So under this reasoning I cover things that seem unimportant today, but will form the final picture of the man we know today as Barack Obama.
In a sideline news story, "The Coming Insurrection" is a book read by those who are a threat to our society and way of life. Ideologies I thought were once gone, Communism and Anarchy, are reviving. We have religious jihads of violence against our society, and we have the return of Communism and Anarchy. Do not dismiss the readers of "The Coming Insurrection", follow them, keep an eye on them. If anything, and I mean the slightest thing, seems out of place please report them to the police, FBI, or CIA, or our military. I am declaring on my own, and you are free to disagree right now (perhaps not later if the readers succeed), that the readers of this book are to be considered highly dangerous and (as the book demands of them) to be armed as well. The report on Obama will come later as I examine this developing , I don't even know what to call it, this developing threat to our society.
Republicans just don't get it! Barack Obama was not elected president because he has a cool logo. Barack Obama was elected president because the vast majority of Americans are more in line with his political views and values and because they agreed it is time for a change.
Excerpt over. Lets look at Obama's political views and values. They always say actions speak louder than words, and indeed they do with Obama. His words, the words of a politician, can instantly be seen as almost worthless (except to those who believe he still isn't a politician.)
Now what I am about to say will probably seem like old news and unimportant. However it is of the utmost importance. The life of leaders and why they make the decisions they do start in their developing careers. For some, and don't take offense, it is only a reference I know because of the History Channel's numerous documentaries, the process starts in youth before politics are even considered. Hitler's hatred of the Jews developed when Germany lost WW1 and Jews were the outlet for his anger of suffering the trauma of war on the front lines. Barack Obama's political career has effected his decisions and should be looked to in order to see where we are going. I feel that Hitler's Mein Kamf was the plan of his WW2 madness. Barack Obama has a Mein Kamf as well and it is his actions already made. He was smart, because written words now are looked at unlike they were during the days of Hitler. So his actions are his greatest liability and they are known. So under this reasoning I cover things that seem unimportant today, but will form the final picture of the man we know today as Barack Obama.
In a sideline news story, "The Coming Insurrection" is a book read by those who are a threat to our society and way of life. Ideologies I thought were once gone, Communism and Anarchy, are reviving. We have religious jihads of violence against our society, and we have the return of Communism and Anarchy. Do not dismiss the readers of "The Coming Insurrection", follow them, keep an eye on them. If anything, and I mean the slightest thing, seems out of place please report them to the police, FBI, or CIA, or our military. I am declaring on my own, and you are free to disagree right now (perhaps not later if the readers succeed), that the readers of this book are to be considered highly dangerous and (as the book demands of them) to be armed as well. The report on Obama will come later as I examine this developing , I don't even know what to call it, this developing threat to our society.
Plagarism Accusations
Les Otten, according to a Democratic Party email, plagarized Obama's website and logo for his campaign. I want to see the Democratic Party bring this accusation to court. If it is legitimate, they won't have a problem bringing a Republican candidate out of the running. If their complaint is not legitimate, if I was Les Otten I would demand a retraction and apology.
In any accusation of criminality against leaders the truth should be pursued to the end. This email I believe is nothing more than slander. They accuse Otten of stealing Obama's O logo. It is a circle and colorful, but the design is different. Yes it has a circle, but the rest of it doesn't match at all. Seriously, there are only so many ways you can put red white and blue in a circle and have the lower half represent the land and upper half represent the sky. Seriously, press charges or apologize.
The design is colorful with reds, blues, and whites everywhere. Our nation's colors. The similarities are as follows: Red donate button, lots of color and pictures, and the logo is in the shape of a O.
Check it out for yourself and see if you want to also charge plagarism against Les Otten (who, if you read earlier, I dislike his website and positions, so this isn't partisan.)
http://www.lesotten.com/
http://www.barackobama.com/
In any accusation of criminality against leaders the truth should be pursued to the end. This email I believe is nothing more than slander. They accuse Otten of stealing Obama's O logo. It is a circle and colorful, but the design is different. Yes it has a circle, but the rest of it doesn't match at all. Seriously, there are only so many ways you can put red white and blue in a circle and have the lower half represent the land and upper half represent the sky. Seriously, press charges or apologize.
The design is colorful with reds, blues, and whites everywhere. Our nation's colors. The similarities are as follows: Red donate button, lots of color and pictures, and the logo is in the shape of a O.
Check it out for yourself and see if you want to also charge plagarism against Les Otten (who, if you read earlier, I dislike his website and positions, so this isn't partisan.)
http://www.lesotten.com/
http://www.barackobama.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
