When it comes to North Korea I believe I should detail specifically the military alliance forming. Iran purchases the Hwasong-5 (Shahab-1), Hwasong-6 (Shahab-2) and the Rodong-1 (Shahab-3) from North Korea. Also has purchased 18 land-based BM25 missiles. (Source 1). "Libya has been known to receive technological assistance, blueprints and missile parts from North Korea". (Wikipedia quote based on an ISS report). Syria purchases the Hwasong-6 and Rodong-1. Most of North Korea's military weapons are made in Russia, China, or North Korea. This ties in Russia and China deeply to my point of their enabling the capability of North Korea. Tomorrow I will detail further connections (Iran's military connections with the alliance that is forming) and continue my work transcripting the Bruce Poliquin interview.
Sources:
1: Dore Gold, Publisher; Yaakov Amidror, ICA Program Director; Mark Ami-El, Managing Editor. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (Registered Amuta), 13 Tel-Hai St., Jerusalem, Israel; Tel. 972-2-5619281, Fax. 972-2-5619112, Email: jcpa@netvision.net.il. In U.S.A.: Center for Jewish Community Studies, 5800 Park Heights Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA, Tel. (410) 664-5222; Fax. (410) 664-1228. Website: www.jcpa.org. © Copyright. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Fellows of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.
A little taste of political logic (with a side dose of insanity and humor to make things interesting.) My life will occassionally be brought in with some journalism.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
The Alliances Show Growth
I reported first in 2006 that I saw an alliance of nations forming against the United States to form a new world conflict. This world war is showing signs every day of getting worse. North Korea, one of the three principle states that I list as pawns of Russia, is getting uranium for its nuclear program from Venezuela. It is also scrapping the ceasefire agreement signed roughly half a century ago that has held full scale conflict at bay. No doubt in my mind the U.S., Korean, Japanese led assault, should war occur, win beyond compare to the devastation that would be brought to North Korea's military.
However, with Iranian observers at the testing sights of missiles and nuclear bombs in North Korea, and with Iranian enriched uranium powering these weapons, the intent of peaceful power should be beyond any doubt lost. They are for weapons. Iran wants those weapons. Since Iran can not afford to fund the research and lose political leverage by having a weapons program of their own they are using their ties with North Korea in order to get away from the critics who are too narrow minded to put the connection that I've been outlaying for years into place. The puzzle is not limited by age, only, it seems, by IQ and vision.
The negotiations have failed. Clinton, Bush, and Obama - no matter what level of diplomacy is tried- have failed to stop North Korea. This is because it isn't a policy that is the problem. It is Kim Jung Il. He is a nutcase. He has been all along. No policy is the reason for this, it is the lunatic in North Korea. Proven, however, is that the nutcase does not respond to diplomacy. It simply has not and will not work.
Russia is who I look to for the key response, not China, in North Korea's tests. China is an ally and if they shift it is only a logical movement due to international pressure. Russia, however, has very little it seems involved. The test was another condemnation, but sanctions for punishment are opposed by Russia and they continue to say only the six-party talks, in place for over a decade that have failed, are the solution. They sound more entrenched to a policy than George Bush or Obama ever thought of being. Why, when the evidence is so clear, would not just Obama, (which is an analysis for action in and of itself) but Russia continue to support the status qou for the international community while North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Bolivia, and Ecuador work together, with Russia's aid (500 nuclear scientists are operating in Iran) continue to move forward in developing weapons with only the slight nudges from Russia?
With Russia obviously having benefit from these things, (a jab at the U.S. or any other reason which I will go into later) I believe they should, like an affiliated judge in a case, not be allowed to vote in the Security Council on this issue. I truly believe the general assembly should be the body to vote in a resolution with teeth, and the Security Council be the one to give the final go ahead but alas, the U.N. refuses to change. Seventy years and the U.N. still sucks at stopping genocide. Ahem, back to the topic.
The reason I think Russia supports stalling for these nations is that it would love nothing less than to see the United States and its allies get involved in a worldwide war against Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador, Hondorus, Nicaragua, North Korea, Lebanon, Libya, and others with limited nuclear capability. The logic I have is this: if we know North Korea only has one or two nukes, if they use one, they don't have anymore. If they use their only supply, using ours in relaliation, instead of a measure for the utmost essence of survival, would not be approved. Using a nuclear weapon would not stop the conflict, as the areas of battle would still be numerous beyond compare. So, nuking them all would stop the war but create devastation and moral compromise in the world that a win would become an eternal loss for generations with genocide accusations flying almost forever. Russia, all it would have to do is claim neutrality and sit back and build itself to watch the new lower alliance it built fight a direct-to proxy conflict against the United States.
I may be raving like a madman but every week more information adds to the picture that is getting clearer and clearer: I am right.
If I am right the end of American dominance, if we continue our blind path towards the poisonous well, is at hand. Without our clear dominance, our destiny to exist as a free society forever will fade. Our culture is the world's culture. If America loses freedom, the world loses freedom. Russia will get Europe and reform itself. Communism may no longer be the mantle of conquest: revenge for Russians, "benevolent dictatorship" for Europe, and brutalization of the other nations it conquests will be the approach for Russia. A new plundering of the world will take place if Russia is allowed to rival the United States in power. It is frightening and I hope I am wrong.
However, with Iranian observers at the testing sights of missiles and nuclear bombs in North Korea, and with Iranian enriched uranium powering these weapons, the intent of peaceful power should be beyond any doubt lost. They are for weapons. Iran wants those weapons. Since Iran can not afford to fund the research and lose political leverage by having a weapons program of their own they are using their ties with North Korea in order to get away from the critics who are too narrow minded to put the connection that I've been outlaying for years into place. The puzzle is not limited by age, only, it seems, by IQ and vision.
The negotiations have failed. Clinton, Bush, and Obama - no matter what level of diplomacy is tried- have failed to stop North Korea. This is because it isn't a policy that is the problem. It is Kim Jung Il. He is a nutcase. He has been all along. No policy is the reason for this, it is the lunatic in North Korea. Proven, however, is that the nutcase does not respond to diplomacy. It simply has not and will not work.
Russia is who I look to for the key response, not China, in North Korea's tests. China is an ally and if they shift it is only a logical movement due to international pressure. Russia, however, has very little it seems involved. The test was another condemnation, but sanctions for punishment are opposed by Russia and they continue to say only the six-party talks, in place for over a decade that have failed, are the solution. They sound more entrenched to a policy than George Bush or Obama ever thought of being. Why, when the evidence is so clear, would not just Obama, (which is an analysis for action in and of itself) but Russia continue to support the status qou for the international community while North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Bolivia, and Ecuador work together, with Russia's aid (500 nuclear scientists are operating in Iran) continue to move forward in developing weapons with only the slight nudges from Russia?
With Russia obviously having benefit from these things, (a jab at the U.S. or any other reason which I will go into later) I believe they should, like an affiliated judge in a case, not be allowed to vote in the Security Council on this issue. I truly believe the general assembly should be the body to vote in a resolution with teeth, and the Security Council be the one to give the final go ahead but alas, the U.N. refuses to change. Seventy years and the U.N. still sucks at stopping genocide. Ahem, back to the topic.
The reason I think Russia supports stalling for these nations is that it would love nothing less than to see the United States and its allies get involved in a worldwide war against Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador, Hondorus, Nicaragua, North Korea, Lebanon, Libya, and others with limited nuclear capability. The logic I have is this: if we know North Korea only has one or two nukes, if they use one, they don't have anymore. If they use their only supply, using ours in relaliation, instead of a measure for the utmost essence of survival, would not be approved. Using a nuclear weapon would not stop the conflict, as the areas of battle would still be numerous beyond compare. So, nuking them all would stop the war but create devastation and moral compromise in the world that a win would become an eternal loss for generations with genocide accusations flying almost forever. Russia, all it would have to do is claim neutrality and sit back and build itself to watch the new lower alliance it built fight a direct-to proxy conflict against the United States.
I may be raving like a madman but every week more information adds to the picture that is getting clearer and clearer: I am right.
If I am right the end of American dominance, if we continue our blind path towards the poisonous well, is at hand. Without our clear dominance, our destiny to exist as a free society forever will fade. Our culture is the world's culture. If America loses freedom, the world loses freedom. Russia will get Europe and reform itself. Communism may no longer be the mantle of conquest: revenge for Russians, "benevolent dictatorship" for Europe, and brutalization of the other nations it conquests will be the approach for Russia. A new plundering of the world will take place if Russia is allowed to rival the United States in power. It is frightening and I hope I am wrong.